Optimistic PoEx vs TEE: One Fails the Enterprise Audit

• Script contradicts its own storyboard on Base: narration asserts 'Base-native TEE nodes are in production' but the bento card correctly labels Base as 'Settlement layer, not a TEE provider' — one of these is wrong; both cannot publish.
• '7 days standard' lifts the Optimism/Arbitrum L2 finality window and drops it onto optimistic PoEx without justification; EigenLayer AVS dispute periods are operator-configured, not standardized — cite the specific SDK or cut the number.
• Othentic 'fails the audit' is stated as settled fact with zero evidence; the target audience will demand the receipt; source an actual enterprise RFP clause or an audit report, or reframe as architectural risk rather than verdict.
• Enterprise Q1 2025 procurement wave needs one named signal — an analyst report, a public procurement framework, a named buyer — otherwise it reads as assertion, which violates the archetype's own 'proof not promises' mandate.
• Hook lands clean; OPERATOR/COMMANDER dialogue earns its 6.5 seconds; slasher/receipt opposition framing is tight and genuinely on-archetype.
• Terminal scene and bento disambiguation of Phala/Marlin/Base are the two strongest visual moments — bento especially does real editorial work.
• Fix the Base contradiction and source the Othentic claim before render; those two errors will surface immediately with this audience.

Storyboard / 30.5s

Script